partypiratesat

The leaks are so far relatively boring. That politicians talk differently to brokers then they talk to the public is no surprise and was commonly expected. The idea of open borders may be a nightmare for some paranoid nationalists, specially in America, but it won't cost HRC the election. If Scrooge Mc. Trump wasn't such a bizarre character, they still could have made an impact, but that is speculative.

That's why it is so absurd, that the HRC-campaign is making that completely ridiculous claim that wikileaks was  controlled by Russia. Maybe they are afraid of what is still to be revealed, maybe they continue their revenge against that organization, that reveals the total incompetence of the American administrations and services depending Internet security. Whatever the reason may be, the attempt to wipe all that is publicized off the table by describing it as Russian propaganda in favour of Trump is pathetic. But it is a signature-piece of "Correct The Record", Clinton's organization for social-media-propaganda, that has been seeking ways to diminish the credibility of persons and organizations that reveal inappropriate behavior by Clinton and her friends for years.

Let's face the facts: the co-founder and spokesman of wikileaks is Julian Assange. He resides in the embassy of Ecuador in London, threatened to be executed by the USA if extradited to them, and has no connection to Russia whatsoever. The wikileaks-servers are mirrored all over the world, to make sure that a crackdown on them by a government of a single country that has a bad conscience doesn't bring them down. They do that on purpose, they have already experienced such incidents. All of that is commonly known and can be found on their website as well as on the Wikipedia-page about wikileaks:

Until August 2010, WikiLeaks was hosted by PRQ, a Sweden-based company providing "highly secure, no-questions-asked hosting services". PRQ is said to have "almost no information about its clientele and maintains few if any of its own logs". Currently, WikiLeaks is hosted mainly by the Swedish internet service provider Bahnhof in the Pionen facility, a former nuclear bunker in Sweden. Other servers are spread around the world with the main server located in Sweden. Julian Assange has said that the servers are located in Sweden (and the other countries) "specifically because those nations offer legal protection to the disclosures made on the site". He talks about the Swedish constitution, which gives the information providers total legal protection. It is forbidden according to Swedish law for any administrative authority to make inquiries about the sources of any type of newspaper. These laws, and the hosting by PRQ, make it difficult for any authorities to eliminate WikiLeaks; they place an onus of proof upon any complainant whose suit would circumscribe WikiLeaks' liberty, e.g. its rights to exercise free speech online. Furthermore, "WikiLeaks maintains its own servers at undisclosed locations, keeps no logs and uses military-grade encryption to protect sources and other confidential information." Such arrangements have been called "bulletproof hosting".

In August 2010, the Swedish Pirate Party announced it would be hosting, managing, and maintaining many of WikiLeaks' new servers without charge.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks

The only "argument" for the accusation is the fact, that Edward Snowden was forced to seek asylum in Russia, because Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton threaten his life for being so brave to make public the crimes of their administration against the civil rights of citizens not only of America, but the whole world. But Snowden is still only an informant to wikileaks. Sincerely the most prominent and for sure one of the most important, but still nothing more. Never ever has he been a part of their administration, organization or staff. To build a claim like the one wikileaks was controlled by Russia, only on the fact that Snowden is hiding there, is bizarre.

This strategy makes Mrs Clinton more unfit to be president every time she uses it. Still less unfit then trump, but unfit anyhow. Americans should go for Johnson, he is in contrary to Trump and Clinton a decent, honest guy.

ahoy
hellboy