Author Topic: Meinungsfreiheit am Arsch  (Read 2958 times)


  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1664
    • View Profile
Re: Meinungsfreiheit am Arsch
« on: 2015, 01, 25; 01:50:56 »
Quote from: theguardian
Wikipedia bans five editors from gender-related articles
Online encyclopedia’s highest court rules on more than 10 editors deemed to be breaking the site’s rules amid Gamergate controversy

Wikipedia’s arbitration committee, the highest user-run body on the site, has banned five editors from making corrections to articles about feminism, in an attempt to stop a long-running edit war over the entry on the “Gamergate controversy”.

The editors, who were all actively attempting to prevent the article from being rewritten with a pro-Gamergate slant, were sanctioned by “arbcom” in its preliminary decision. While that may change as it is finalised, the body, known as Wikipedia’s supreme court, rarely reverses its decisions.

The sanction bars the five editors from having anything to do with any articles covering Gamergate, but also from any other article about “gender or sexuality, broadly construed”.

Editors who had been pushing for the Wikipedia article to be fairer to Gamergate have also been sanctioned by the committee, but one observer warns that those sanctions have only hit “throwaway” accounts.

“No sanctions at all were proposed against any of Gamergate’s warriors, save for a few disposable accounts created specifically for the purpose of being sanctioned,” said Mark Bernstein, a writer and Wikipedia editor.

In contrast, he says, “by my informal count, every feminist active in the area is to be sanctioned. This takes care of social justice warriors with a vengeance — not only do the Gamergaters get to rewrite their own page (and Zoe Quinn’s, Brianna Wu’s, Anita Sarkeesian’s, etc); feminists are to be purged en bloc from the encyclopedia.”


Auf Deutsch da:

Quote from: genderama
In der deutschen Wikipedia hat die radikalfeministische Fraktion von Andreas Kemper bis "Fiona Baine" die Einträge zum Genderthema fest im Griff – und die anderen Mitarbeiter der Enzyklopädie schauen untätig zu. Offene Hetze gegen Andersdenkende wird achselzuckend hingenommen; am Beibehalten des Neutral Point of View sind deutsche Wikipedianer nicht interessiert. In der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hingegen hat man der ideologischen Korruption jetzt einen Riegel vorgeschoben


Soviel zu Wikipedia als Quelle für zuverlässige Informationen. 💭

Darwin was wrong.                   i'd rather be morally right
Man is still an ape.                   than politically correct!